Tangible Standards
 |
| S. Carlo ai Catinari and its Convent, Rome |
Michael Graves’ editorial on drawing in the New
York Times has sparked many reactions in the architecture community. I reviewed
his book of drawings from his time in Rome several years ago, and over the
years have given copies of his excellent essay on “The Necessity for Drawing:
Tangible Speculation” to my students, since I like him am concerned not only
that students don’t draw, they don’t really know what drawing is for or how it
works in the design process.
But let me take this in another direction. Drawing
has been in crisis longer than the advent of the computer. From the moment
architects abandoned the accumulated knowledge of the classical tradition in
the middle of the last century, drawing has become one of those things, to
paraphrase Samuel Johnson, that is not so remarkable that it is done well, but
that it is done at all. Naïve drawing, which Graves cultivated as much as Le Corbusier,
Hejduk, and Krier, became a slightly disingenuous, aw shucks, I’m just sayin’
kind of performance, not wanting to be measured against real drawing
achievements from the past while asserting the value of the hand in the face of
an increasingly faceless, technologically-driven profession.
 |
| Fountain of Tivoli, Villa d'Este |
But people like John
Blatteau and Steve Bonitatibus were simultaneously revivifying classical
drawing for architecture, especially wash rendering; and in the art world many
artists were recovering the skills of accurate figurative drawing. Some remarkable
draftsmen like Randy Melick have made themselves absolutely measurable against
the finest draftsmen of the past. This has been hard won, but perhaps even
harder among architects than artists since there were fewer threads of
continuity across the middle of the century in architecture.
If drawing is in crisis it is certainly due to ever
more sophisticated software; but it is also due to ever less able draftsmanship
among the profession’s “leaders.” Let me say, though, that it is wholly within
our abilities, and incumbent on us, to not only draw, but draw well. Drawing
should be desirable, something worth emulating. Just drawing for its own sake
won’t cut it.
 |
| Diogenes and Alexander, modello |
I’m just sayin’.
