Don’t
Visit
At
the beginning of a Baroque odyssey, of a compact smattering of sites treated in
Henry Russell Hitchcock’s Rococo
Architecture in Southern Germany (OK, I call it Baroque, he calls it
Rococo, but then the pearl is born in the shell; not to mention that so far I’m
in Switzerland, and will eventually wind up in Austria), I thought I would post
some images from two spectacular, and related, monasteries: Einsiedeln and St.
Gallen. For those who lament the loss of medieval St. Gall, read no further. I
am besotted by these two places, so filled are they with joy, exuberance, and
sheer love of beauty (if those are qualities one doesn’t associate these days with
Switzerland, well, that’s a study for a sociologist; come to think of it, The
Sociology of Modernism would be a worthwhile study for someone to do). I’m
researching topics for my forthcoming book on Invention, but let me just point
out one particular from St. Gallen that speaks to the wonderfully rich, and
fundamentally human, culture that informed these two monastic complexes. The
strength, to me at least, of the St. Gallen church’s decorative program is the
figurative reliefs (the decorative rococo ornament work is spectacular as well,
if hard to separate from its coloristic role). And here I just want to zoom in
to one detail, which for me sums up the supreme humanity in the otherwise
overwhelmingly artistic milieu.
Two
monks offer bread to a poor woman with her child, and a grizzled old beggar
man. He would be only a type if it weren’t for the fact of his peg leg, thrust
out into space over the rococo ornament below (becoming the kind of diagonal
accent that Alpers and Baxandall describe in Tiepolo and the Pictorial Intelligence), so poignantly pulls us
into the message of the relief. This genre detail, even if compositionally
useful, is fundamentally human, even sadly so. What can get lost in the place’s
wealth of detail—not to mention incredible artistic accomplishment, which so
harshly illumines our contemporary mediocrity—is the sense of the corporal, the
capacity of these rarified Benedictines to fulfill their mission of
hospitality, and indeed compassion, as the inscription proclaims: VISCERA MISERICORDIAE.
Mercy
from the gut. The flowering of brilliance in European culture in the first half
of the eighteenth century—the like of which we haven’t seen since—was not
divorced from the human, the real, the necessary. At Einsiedeln the beautifully
ordered monastic complex abuts a hillside where their horses still graze,
serenaded in the morning by alpine horns; the earthy, natural side of life fits
seamlessly with the refined and spiritual sides. Would that we could recover
that balance, although where it hasn’t been destroyed it lives still.
I would take up your challenge of studying the sociology of modernism but it would be a very frustrating exercise too. So many like-minded potential classicists live with a fear inborn in architecture school and intellectual circles. It is a fear of appearing to be stupid and to boot to have the 'bad taste' enough to actually 'like' the Baroque. You mention Guggenheim Bilbao and they say, "It's great." I ask "What's so great about it?" They can't tell you and they are profoundly shocked when you say provocatively, "It's just a piece of junk." but they can never argue a case why it is not a piece of junk. Instead they say to you, "Oh come on, just because it is not classical." One gives up and tries once again to be 'nice'.
ReplyDelete