Follow-up
to An Academy of Emulation
Rubens, The Feast of Venus |
At some level the idea of an academy of
emulation encapsulates the general practice of emulation. In other words, what
is taught is what an emulative artist would do (and continue to do throughout
her or his career). To make the implications of this more clear—and to clarify
perhaps how Old Master artists saw their challenges—I would distinguish two categories
of techniques of classical work in the emulative tradition: techniques
necessary for invention, and “pro forma” techniques. What I’m suggesting is
that artists like Rubens, Cortona or Pittoni displayed their virtuosity by a
combination of pro forma displays of accomplishment (part of the art of
documentation), and more daring techniques proper to invention. Primarily
(unless he was working on portraiture) Rubens would have privileged invention,
with documentation as a necessary but complementary display of his mastery.
Those two categories were composed of the following aspects:
I.
Techniques Necessary for Invention
- Foreshortening
- Rotating figures in space
- Projecting shadows
- Reflected lights (luminosity)
- Spatial depth/layering
Spatial layering in Rubens |
II.
Pro-forma Techniques
- Anatomy (some telltale display, e.g. a prominent knee)
- Perspective (even if, and generally more commonly, fragmentary)
- Materials and textures (the “still life” aspect)
Still life in the Feast of Venus |
G. B. Pittoni, The Sacrifice of Polyxena |
The pro forma aspects are those things
about which the consummate academic artist, Carlo Maratta, claimed tanto che basti—all that’s enough—in his
polemical print addressed to students of drawing. One only needed, and should
not usually exceed, enough of those pro forma displays to establish the
credibility of the invented image. Since the image was a scene often difficult
to pose or stage in the studio—think of ceiling paintings, or scenes of battle
or martyrdom—invention was the thing, and artists primarily studied the figure
in order not to need the model while inventing. Being able to imagine a figure
turned, even hovering, in space, extending an arm and projecting a shadow or
receiving a projected shadow from a distant object, making light bouncy and
lively, and creating the illusion of space and depth beyond what could be
achieved with linear perspective: this was the stuff of mastery, of virtuosity.
Invention techniques need imagination,
pro forma techniques depend on documentation. The experience of documentation
trains the imagination—not forgetting, of course, the documentation of
exemplary works of art!
Perspective and spatial layering |
No comments:
Post a Comment